Hand Count Elections Are Simple, Reliable, Affordable, and Within Reach!
We are so excited to announce the launch of an unprecedented county-by-county campaign to ban all voting machines, beginning with Texas State, with the balance of battleground states to launch in the next two weeks.
Recently we reported on the FBI’s 'Extremely Alarming' Election Threats! Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) recently pointed out significant advancements that could empower nations like China, North Korea, and Russia to target U.S. election systems. The heightened risk, according to Goldstein, applies to every location, regardless of size or sector.
Consider Germany, one of 26 democratic nations, that conducts hand count elections now shielded from foreign and domestic election interference. Remarkably, they confidently report their election results by morning. The question that echoes is simple: why can't we achieve the same efficiency?
These nations have banned electronic election technology, using America's experiences as a cautionary tale of what can go wrong. They emphasize the sacred nature of elections, demanding tamper-proof processes with complete verifiable records and a robust forensic audit trail to expose fraud. In America, we’re told we can’t even see or audit electronic election data due to contract agreements-who’s running our elections?
While it might seem unconventional for proud Americans to look to Europe and other nations for guidance, our election security needs require a thorough examination.
Let's debunk the hand count myths that have kept us in the dark:
"It’s Less Accurate than Machines." The truth is hand counting provides a more accurate reflection of the people's will. It eliminates the risk of glitches, malfunctions, or external interference that machines may succumb to and typically provides triple verification of the tally.
"It Requires Too Many Counters." The reality is that hand counting can be efficiently organized with proper planning and coordination. Nations that hand count prove how simple and achievable it is to report results in the first 24 hours, if not by morning.
"It’s Too Expensive." On the contrary, hand-counting elections are cost-effective. Eliminating the need for expensive voting machines reduces the enormous financial burden on the electoral system, ensuring resources are allocated more judiciously.
Notably, the primary arguments against hand counting never include security risks.
Did you know most state laws permit local election officials to conduct 100% hand count elections?
Why We Can’t Allow Voting Machines in US Elections:
Any representative rejecting the banning of these voting machines and electronic devices is protecting a fundamentally unsecure and potentially unconstitutional election system. The reality that any entry-level hacker can penetrate these systems within a mere 1-7 minutes, whether in person or remotely, is a grave threat to the election process.
The indiscriminate vulnerability of voting machines, irrespective of internet connectivity, demands swift and decisive action. Beyond the machines used in local precincts, the evidence of remote hacking through state systems, including unauthorized access to central vote tallies on state government websites, underscores the urgent need for local and legislative intervention.
Moreover, the undetectability of intrusions, often lingering undiscovered for extended periods averaging one year, poses an existential threat to the credibility of our elections. Even institutions with advanced cybersecurity measures, such as the Pentagon, NSA, the White House, and numerous state government and utility systems, have fallen victim to successful intrusions. The simplicity of voting machines makes them particularly susceptible, warranting immediate attention to secure our election infrastructure.
It’s a disgrace for lawmakers to continue to defend the impossible and blatantly false claims that voting machines are safe and secure; a hidden truth that politicians on both sides of the aisle agreed on before 2016.
Texas Voters are Ready for Change! Texas Hill Country's GOP, including Gillespie and Kerr Counties, is leading a shift towards hand-counted ballots in the upcoming March primary. This aligns with a broader trend seen in GOP leadership across Texas, where considerations for hand-counting ballots are gaining momentum, from larger counties like Dallas to smaller ones like Uvalde. The move signifies a potential resurgence of conventional hand-count elections, with Texas Hill Country at the forefront. Will you help put your state on the map next?
Please Take 1 Minute to Act and Share With Everyone You Know!
TEXAS STATE: Call on County Election Officials to Ban Voting Machines and Hand Count Elections Today. Phone Your County Election Administrator Here>>
BECOME A MEMBER! For the Price of a Couple of Cups of Coffee a Month, You Can Help Us Counter the Left’s Major Aims in 2024!
MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD AND SECURE OUR ELECTIONS IN YOUR STATE!
This warning should not be ignored and our country's voting machines are viable and vulnerable targets!! EQUALLY as vulnerable is the "unhardened" power grid which would result in the inability to carry out an election dependent on electronic voting machines. (?)
I have to ask this question, why aren't the the FBI, CISA and the Federal and State government acting now to avoid this threat by putting their resources into the implementation of secure watermarked paper ballots and bipartisan hand counting??
Coupled with the current situation of what appears to be an invasion of millions of "unvetted" migrants, this is a recipe for disaster. Trump cites 2005 Obama remarks to support immigration policy in October 2018....its merely common sense.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1054874705491120133?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1054874705491120133%7Ctwgr%5E609efbacf11d6f619c70a8defe09b4b1ae38f505%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Ftrump-cites-2005-obama-remarks-to-support-immigration-policy